Shark NV502 VS NV552: Similar But Different

Shark NV502 VS NV552: Similar But Different
5 (1) vote

Considering a Shark vacuum? Here is the answer for you.Shark vacuum cleaners are worthy every of your penny. They offer many of features and capabilities of high-end products at a fraction of the price. Several Shark products lead the best-sellers list for years regardless of top products from its rivals. Among those machines, Shark NV502 vs NV552 are seen as the answer for those who want a premium quality vacuum cleaner. They belong to Shark Rotator and I have already made a similar review about Shark NV502 (check Shark NV501 vs NV502).

If you do a little research about Shark brand, you’ll know that it is well-known for the diversity, including Shark Navigator, Shark Rotator, Shark Ion and Shark Rocket, etc. Interestingly, Shark has offered 4 different models of Rotator vacuums: professional, professional lift-away, professional with XL reach and vac or steam. And, Shark NV502 and NV552 are products of Rotator Professional Lift-away with advanced technologies and useful lift-away function.

Shark NV502 and NV552 receives thousands of positive feedbacks on the Internet. If you are looking for a quality machine with reasonable price, you are on the right track. Keep reading to know more about these two amazing units.

Shark NV502 vs NV552: Comparison And Review

Basically, many Shark models which is in the same vacuum line are similar with a small difference in price and attached tools. Shark NV502 vs NV552 are no exception. They share many things in common but obviously what makes them standout will attract customers more. Aren’t you curious? Then keep reading.

The Design

Shark NV502 vs NV552

Fortunately, their appearance isn’t similar. Hence, you won’t get confused when looking at them. They are available in different colors. While the NV502 comes with white and red, the NV552 has gold color. However, the structure is similar as they both bagless and upright vacuum. In addition, they feature Lift-away function which allows Shark NV502 vs NV552 to transform into a portable vacuums for cleaning difficult areas, such as ceiling or corners.

According to Shark’s information, Shark NV502 vs NV552 have the same dimensions, 13.4 x 12.2 x 45.7 inches.

The Portability

Shark products have never disappointed customers about their maneuverability. Actually, great portability is one of its strengths. This is obtained thanks to Swivel Steering technology which is a great help in guiding the machines around obstacles, such as table legs or sofas. In addition, they weigh about 15 pounds and many people really don’t consider them to be heavy at all. The portable canister is lifted for easily doing clean-up jobs on stairs.

The Cleaning Performance

After all, what matter now is how well these two perform, right? According to customers’ feedbacks, Shark NV502 and NV552 show very satisfactory performance on various kinds of surfaces. Let’s what lies behind those compliments.

  • First and foremost, Shark NV502 and NV552 are equipped with Never Loses Suction technology which is guaranteed no loss of suction power during the clean-up job and many years of use. Actually, this feature is well-known and many customers consider buying Shark vacuums because of it.
  • The headlights on the floor nozzle of Shark NV502 and NV552 is a big advantage, especially while you clean dark areas, such as under bed or corners. Shark ensure there is no dust or dirt left behind.
  • Shark NV502 and NV552 are integrated with HEPA filters and Anti-Allergens Complete Seal technology. This systems can trap over 99.9% of dust and allergens inside the vacuums. This is somehow perfect for those who have respiratory problems because it protects the surrounding air.
  • Both vacuum come with 9.5” cleaning path width and 30” cord length. With those features, Shark NV502 and NV552 are able to clean a large space without moving frequently.
  • Only the NV552 features cyclonic technology which separates the dirt from the air, keeping it from clogging filters, along with never-loses-suction technology. It is claimed to reduce a number of microscopic particles that linger in the air stream by creating powerful centrifugal forces to spin dust and debris directly into the canister and keep it there.

The Accessories

This is a different point between Shark NV502 and NV552, Check it out

The Shark Rotator Pro NV502 comes with a Dusting Brush, Crevice Tool, Premium Power Brush, Car Detail Kit, Straight Suction Nozzle and Canister Caddy.

The Shark Rotator Pro Complete Lift-Away Vacuum NV552 includes a 18″ Crevice Tool, Dusting Brush, Multi Angle Dusting Brush, Premium Power Brush, Wide Upholstery Tool, Under Appliance Wand, Dust Away Tool with a Microfiber Pad, Canister Caddy, and an Accessory Bag.

The Price

Another different point is here. Shark NV502 vs NV552 both charge pretty high cost, about $300 on Amazon. Hence, it may be perfect for middle- or high-income families. There is a small difference between these two but it’s really not a big deal.

If you like one of them, please click the following Amazon buttons to buy:

Shark NV502

Shark NV552

The Feedbacks

Shark NV502 receives 4.4 out of 5 stars with up to 66% of customers rating 5 stars on Amazon. In general, all customers were satisfied with the NV502’s performance. They praised the NV502 for its fantastic suction power. It did a wonderful job on even the toughest surface. In addition, it was ultra-quiet. Nevertheless, some people, especially the older, found this machine a bit heavy.

Customer rating of Shark NV552 on Amazon is 4.3 out of 5 stars. People were adored the lift off feature and content with its performance on removing pet fur. Many “best vacuum” comments were seen on the review section. However, there was compliant about its hose as it was heavy to some people.

The Conclusion

When Shark NV502 and NV552 is put on a balance, they are really neck to neck in many aspects. In general, the core elements are similar. If you want to decide between these two, you should consider their attached tools which add more diversity for usage.

Now, let me hear your thoughts. Which one do you prefer?